B. Quinn, The fresh Western pictures out of John Light, step 1577-1590 (2 vols

2. William Camden, Historie . (London area, 1630), III, pp. 61-62; Jerome Age. Brooks, Tobacco: their Background Illustrated . about Library off George Arents (5 vols., New york, 1937-52), We, pp. 46-49; II, pp. 156-158; Roentgen. Letter. Salaman, The real history and Personal Dictate of one’s Potato (Cambridge, 1949), pp. 83-96; Quinn, Roanoke Voyages , I, pp. 344-348.

BIGGES, WALTER. Good Summarie and Correct Discourse out-of Sir Frances [sic] Drakes West Indian Trip. (First line out-of name and some statements cut.) That have woodcut printer’s mark away from Richard Community into the title. 4 departs, 37 (1) pp., step 1 blank leaf. Small quarto. Morocco.

Another ENGLISH Model, typed an equivalent seasons since earliest. The current Roger Ward model is apparently quicker infamous as compared to Richard Community model (STC 3056) and this preceded they a comparable year–comprehend the earlier matter. STC-Bishop-Ramage locate simply cuatro copies of your own Ward release while the up against 11 of the Job. Today’s copy has the leaf until the identity, blank except for this new signature-draw « A good, » and empty leaf in the bottom.

F. » was provided for ocean on the March cuatro, 1589, for the purpose of reconnoitering this new Iberian coasts when preparing to possess new Drake-Norris journey out-of 1589

STC 3057; Sabin 20841; Chapel 136 (note); Waters (ed.), Real and you can Perfecte Newes . Syr Frauncis Drake , pp. 53-70; Quinn, ed., The brand new Roanoke Voyages , We, pp. 32-thirty-five.

« T. He gets information of destiny of your own Invincible Armada from the earlier seasons: « So when concerning the last Fleete, [an effective marchant off Lisbone] sayth, regarding every ships and carvels of one’s Foreign-language Fleete you will find get back however, nine and thirtie. but the majority of all people you to showed up domestic died immediatly on their getting. Also the Duke regarding Medina is actually banished the fresh new Judge permanently. » Which second detail is pretty not the case–King Philip did not blame the brand new Duke into the inability regarding the Armada promotion. The guy together with brings particulars of a naval step of Lisbon from inside the and therefore an effective Greek watercraft full of wine off Crete is captured, and you may forecasts great profits towards coming attack.

(WINGFIELD, ANTHONY). A real Coppie regarding a discourse written by a guy, in brand new later Voyage out of Spaine and Portingale. dos departs, 58 pp., step 1 blank leaf. (Pp. 27-31 lacking, supplied from inside the photostat.) Woodcut vignette for the label. Short quarto. Old boards, fabric back.

First Release, Earliest Matter. Wingfield’s narrative is the most intricate account extant of one’s 1589 assault with the The country of spain asked of the Sir Francis Drake and you may Sir John Norreys (Norris), hence sailed of Plymouth into the April 17, 1589, and you will returned later in the June. However, an enthusiastic unnumbered later on checklist gets Wingfield while the blogger. step 1

The newest journey were not successful with its dominating mission, the fresh raising off good rebellion in Portugal up against Queen Philip II of The country of spain, together with enthroning of Dom Antonio, the final men offshoot of one’s Aviz dynasty, inside Philip’s put. It performed some harm to Spanish naval shipment at Corunna, and particular marks of your Armada of the previous year; and over 60 vessels loaded with corn and you will naval supplies and therefore the brand new mobifriends English considered contraband was indeed taken near Lisbon on Hanse.

On STC the book are wrongly ascribed in order to King Elizabeth’s favourite, Robert Devereux, Earl off Essex, exactly who took part in the new trip–far against the Queen’s have a tendency to–while the a volunteer

Two issues of this work are extant; signature E (pp. 25-32), which relates events of the attack upon Lisbon, in some copies (including this one) contains a passage in praise of the Earl of Essex on p. 26 (E 1 verso). As Queen Elizabeth was highly displeased with the Earl’s running off on this voyage against her orders, it is perhaps likely that the issue with the passage is the earlier of the two.